In the first days of 2026, the US government not only launched a war of aggression against the sovereign Caribbean state of Venezuela, but also kidnapped the elected president Nicolás Maduro and his wife in the form of state kidnapping. It borders on a “Wild West” mentality when the US government under Trump believes it can resolve political conflicts with such forms of vigilante justice.
Governments around the world—including UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres—are outraged by this high-handed action by the US government. However, the messages from Europe are ambivalent. EU Foreign Affairs Representative Ms. Kallas feels compelled to point out that the election of the Venezuelan president was controversial. In doing so, she legitimizes this action by the US government, which violates international law. The US government cites “drug terrorism” as its “justification.” However, such an “offense” exists neither in international criminal law nor in American law. Nevertheless, the Venezuelan president is to be charged in a Washington district court.
While democratic governments express their criticism of the US’s actions, the “vultures” are already swooping down on their supposed “prey.” María Corina Machado, winner of the “Peace” prize, who called on US President Trump to intervene militarily, declares who should be the future president of Venezuela. Trump announced that the US intends to exercise governmental authority in Venezuela in the near future by them-self. It is clear that this is not about democracy and freedom for the people.
The FIR and its member associations strongly condemn this state terrorism by the US government. It calls on governments and civil society forces in Europe and beyond to speak out with clear political signals against this action by the US government, which violates international law. A solution to the conflict can only be achieved by non-military means and on the basis of negotiations involving the Venezuelan people.



